Invisible Power Plays: How AI Infrastructure Quietly Reshaped Tech in 2025

It wasn’t that long ago we were promised a future where AI would do our chores, write our emails, and—apparently—win wars for us. This week in tech, that shimmering promise took on a fresh coat of reality, cementing itself not just in consumer services and gadgets, but in the mechanics of money, military, and even market research. And like all things in tech, the line between innovation and influence, open standards and open power grabs, gets ever fuzzier.

Acquisitions, Accelerations, and a Dash of Irony

The big headline: Intel is set to acquire SambaNova, a leading AI chip startup, for what’s likely a bargain compared to its 2021 valuation (WIRED). This is less about synergy and more about survival—Intel’s need to catch up in AI hardware is glaring as Nvidia continues its supernova-level ascent, as also highlighted in Engadget’s year-in-review.

Meanwhile, funding keeps pouring into the AI infrastructure layer. Fal, a startup that hosts multimodal AI models for developers, just closed another $140 million led by Sequoia, tripling its valuation to $4.5 billion, serving heavyweights like Adobe and Shopify (TechCrunch). It’s a sign that if you’re selling AI picks and shovels, you’re on the right side of the gold rush.

Biggest Winners: Hardware, Smart Glasses, and the AI Boom

2025’s big winners, according to Engadget, include Nvidia, Nintendo, fast charging, and—you guessed it—magnets (wait for it). Nvidia’s stock exploded while its chips powered both the datacenter arms race and your cousin’s questionable generative art projects. Foldable phones finally got practical, and even smart glasses managed to avoid looking ridiculous, thanks in part to an injection of AI enabling hands-free experiences. Who would have thought that convenience, not selfie potential, was the killer feature?

Curiously, tech billionaires basked in policy-fueled prosperity, and AI slop—low-effort, algorithm-generated content and videos—flooded every feed. Most people can’t tell AI content apart from the real thing—a win for big tech, perhaps, but hardly a win for public trust.

The New AI Arms Race: User Time, Not Just Users

AI chatbots are in a full-blown attention war. Google’s Gemini has made surprising strides in user engagement, surpassing ChatGPT in time spent per user, even if it still trails in overall user count (Digital Trends). The viral boost came thanks to features like Nano Banana—a name as sticky as its marketing. It’s clear the next battleground for AI assistants is not just about user counts, but user devotion, minutes and hours at a time. OpenAI’s ChatGPT is still king in numbers, but Gemini has momentum. Leadership in 2026 is anyone’s prize.

AI at Work: Platform Wars and Corporate Productivity

The battle for core productivity workflows is in full swing. Superhuman, the premium email client, unveiled new AI features that promise to automate everything from responses to calendar lookups (CNET). Testers are impressed, though the obvious privacy questions remain—Superhuman says it keeps your data out of AI model training, but there’s still a whiff of “just trust us” in the air.

Meanwhile, Cashew Research is using AI to upend the $90B market research industry, offering cheaper, faster, but still human-sourced insights (TechCrunch). Instead of recycling the same tired data, they combine custom surveys with automation, hoping to make bespoke data accessible to more than just the Fortune 500.

Geopolitics and Open Standards: Between Collaboration and Control

Big AI’s favorite pastime—collaboration—continued, with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Block founding the Agentic AI Foundation to standardize AI agents (WIRED). While “open standards” sound reassuringly democratic, let’s not forget that standards-making can enforce as much as it enables. With American AI giants aligning their tools and protocols, the line between cooperative governance and cartel-making can get fuzzy fast.

No discussion of AI and power would be complete without a peek at the military-industrial complex. Google is now providing its Gemini AI system to the US Department of Defense for GenAI.mil, a platform ostensibly for summarizing policy handbooks and creating compliance checklists (The Verge). Officially, Gemini is confined to unclassified use cases; unofficially, it marks another notable reversal from Google’s earlier stances on using AI for warfare. Tech’s commitment to ethics, apparently, remains as flexible as an end-of-quarter revenue target.

Final Thoughts: The Paradox of Progress

This week affirms what many have suspected: The real revolution isn’t the glitzy AI chatbot or the gleaming smart glasses, but the invisible infrastructure—chips, standards, funding, and platform deals—that shape what tech can (and will) become. As behemoths jockey for dominance, smaller players and open initiatives risk being pulled into gravity wells of convenience, centralization, and, yes, compromise.

If there’s a lesson here, it’s that the future of tech is being quietly negotiated in boardrooms, shareholder meetings, and the backend of API calls, long before the rest of us get the product updates or splashy reviews. Stay skeptical; the winners don’t always write the story, but they almost always write the rules.